How it runs
An executive needed to walk into a board meeting with a credible point of view on a fast-moving market, and had two days to get there. The bottleneck was never finding information; it was turning a sprawling, ambiguous question into something a board can actually act on.
The team gave Bricolage the question and the company's internal context. It worked the open web, the literature, regulatory filings and the uploaded documents to assemble a decision briefing: what changed, why it matters, the strategic options on the table, the evidence for and against each, and the risks now emerging. It did not hedge into a research dump; it produced a recommendation and showed its work.
The deliverable read like a strategy briefing, not an AI summary. Every claim carried its source, the assumptions were stated plainly, and a closing section named exactly what would change the recommendation. In the boardroom the executive could say: here is the recommendation, here is the evidence, here are the sources, here is the audit trail, and here is what would make us reconsider.
What changes for the team
- A decision briefing, not a wall of research
- Options framed with the evidence for and against each
- Emerging risks surfaced with their sources
- Every recommendation traceable to what supports it
